The Supreme Court dereliction of duty and the precedent that has been set for future election fraud
5 min read
With the 2020 Presidential Election damage done to America and Republicans being branded by democRATS as terrorists or worse, democRATS claiming on national TV that former US Military veterans and Officers of the Law are racists and a threat to America; the damage these criminals in the democRAT party has done and are doing to America will last forever.
With Government Agencies like the FBI and Department of Justice being in possession of hard drives of the Biden family with massive financial money laundering and blackmail and criminal actions including child pornography about the Biden family in the Governments possession for nearly a year before the 2020 election, and the FBI not doing anything about it, is a crime and shocking.
Basically the FBI and Justice Dept. aided and abetted the Biden crime family to overthrow a sitting president of the United States of America. Even the Supreme Court helped out with the coup d’etat. How can we claim that? Listen to one of the Supremes this week and what he said:
.
Justice Clarence Thomas Dissents From Supreme Court On Election Case: ‘We Need to Make It Clear’
Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas issued a dissenting opinion regarding the high court’s decision not to take up a case challenging the Pennsylvania Nov. 3 election results.
The court on Monday announced it won’t take up lawsuits challenging a Pennsylvania state court decision that relaxed ballot-integrity measures, including a move to extend the ballot-receipt deadline during the November election by three days due to the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus. Former President Donald Trump and Pennsylvania’s GOP urged the court to take up a review of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling.
“This is not a prescription for confidence,” Thomas wrote on Monday, adding that “changing the rules in the middle of the game is bad enough.” Thomas, considered by many to be the most conservative justice, said the court should have granted a review.
“That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future,” Thomas wrote (pdf). “These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”
Other than Thomas, Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch also dissented.
“If state officials have the authority they have claimed, we need to make it clear. If not, we need to put an end to this practice now before the consequences become catastrophic,” Thomas, an appointee of former President George H.W. Bush, also wrote.
Thomas also appeared to make a reference to allegations of fraud and irregularities during the Nov. 3 election.
“We are fortunate that many of the cases we have seen alleged only improper rule changes, not fraud,” Thomas wrote. “But that observation provides only small comfort. An election free from strong evidence of systemic fraud is not alone sufficient for election confidence. Also important is the assurance that fraud will not go undetected.”
The Supreme Court on Monday also declined to review a bid by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) and others who asked the court to strike down a policy that expanded mail-in ballots.
A lawyer for Kelly, Greg Teufel, told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette last week that “it’s important the court should take an interest in whether Pennsylvania’s election laws are administered constitutionally or not, and in accordance with the Pennsylvania constitution and with the federal constitution.” Teufel noted that before the court’s decision on Monday, there was a slim chance of the justices taking it up.
Trump still has a request on the Supreme Court docket regarding his challenge to changes that the Wisconsin Election Commission ordered last year.
THERON NEWS PRESS opinion:
Then, as if to say, America, sorry we as the third branch of government neglected to do our duty of our auth of office and by not doing so, we destroyed you and allowed this criminality to take place. Here is a statement from Supreme Court Judge Samuel Alito on Monday 2/22/2021. A MONTH TOO LATE:
JUSTICE ALITO, with whom JUSTICE GORSUCH joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari.
"I agree with JUSTICE THOMAS that we should grant review in these cases."
What was sad to see is how Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett refused to have an opinion and allowed the 3 democrat justices and the fence-riding John Roberts to refuse hearings and allow the US Constitution to be destroyed. How can we say that? Here is how, all the Election Laws come from the US Constitution. It is prescribed there. What makes it different than other laws of the land is that the election laws and rules have to be administered by election officials and not judges. That also is clear in the Constitution. These Supremes allowing Pennsylvania and other States to get local judges to change election rules in their States was and is illegal.
Now the damage is done and won’t be undone.
The criminals in the democrat party have in this 2020 election, gutted the election laws to fit them and broke the law. Again.
The nice thing for those of you that voted for these criminals, or those of you that did nothing to stop it, is States like Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona that was once conservative patriot States, will from now on always be blue democRAT States, and more and more Democrats will take over all of the government positions until these States are destroyed like California where chaos rains freely and human waste piles up everywhere.
You will reap what you sow!!! You wanted democRATS, the party of the KKK, to rule you. Go ahead, divine justice will pay you back and not in kind!!! Welcome to being a permanent blue State. Damage is done.
